Current:Home > FinanceTrendPulse|Judge strikes down Montana law defining sex as only male or female for procedural reasons -Finovate
TrendPulse|Judge strikes down Montana law defining sex as only male or female for procedural reasons
SafeX Pro View
Date:2025-04-09 18:20:33
MISSOULA,TrendPulse Mont. (AP) — A judge on Tuesday struck down a Montana law that defined “sex” in state law as only male or female, finding that it was unconstitutional.
District Court Judge Shane Vannatta in Missoula ruled the law, passed last year, violated the state constitution because the description of the legislation did not clearly state its purpose.
Transgender, nonbinary, intersex and other plaintiffs challenged the law, similar to ones passed in Kansas and Tennessee, because they said it denies legal recognition and protections to people who are gender-nonconforming. Vannatta did not address that argument, simply finding that the bill’s title did not explain whether the word “sex” referred to sexual intercourse or gender, and did not indicate that the words “female” and “male” would be defined in the body of the bill.
“The title does not give general notice of the character of the legislation in a way that guards against deceptive or misleading titles,” Vannatta wrote.
The bill was approved during a legislative session that also passed a ban on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors and saw transgender lawmaker Democratic Rep. Zooey Zephyr expelled from the House floor, following a protest against Republican lawmakers who had silenced her.
The law that was struck down by Vannatta was sponsored by Republican Sen. Carl Glimm, who said the legislation was necessary after a 2022 court ruling in which a state judge said transgender residents could change the gender markers on their birth certificates.
A spokesperson for Republican Gov. Greg Gianforte, who signed the bill into law, did not immediately return an after-hours email seeking comment on the ruling.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Montana praised it.
“Today’s ruling is an important vindication of the safeguards that the Montana Constitution places on legislative enactments,” the group’s legal director, Alex Rate, said.
veryGood! (75)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- Worst. Tariffs. Ever. (update)
- Sabrina Carpenter Shares Her Self
- Woody Allen and Soon
- Kylie Jenner Shows Off Sweet Notes From Nieces Dream Kardashian & Chicago West
- Morgan Wallen sentenced after pleading guilty in Nashville chair
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Dropping Hints
- Manager of pet grooming salon charged over death of corgi that fell off table
- Bodycam footage shows high
- Taxpayers could get $500 'inflation refund' checks under New York proposal: What to know
Ranking
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Most reports ordered by California’s Legislature this year are shown as missing
- I loved to hate pop music, until Chappell Roan dragged me back
- Beyoncé takes home first award in country music category at 2024 Billboard Music Awards
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Save 30% on the Perfect Spongelle Holiday Gifts That Make Every Day a Spa Day
- Sabrina Carpenter Shares Her Self
- 'Mary': How to stream, what biblical experts think about Netflix's new coming
Recommendation
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
Singaporean killed in Johor expressway crash had just paid mum a surprise visit in Genting
New Jersey, home to many oil and gas producers, eyes fees to fight climate change
Luigi Mangione's Lawyer Speaks Out in UnitedHealthcare CEO Murder Case
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
Shanghai bear cub Junjun becomes breakout star
Stock market today: Asian stocks are mixed ahead of key US inflation data
When is the 'Survivor' Season 47 finale? Here's who's left; how to watch and stream part one