Current:Home > ScamsSupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Finovate
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-18 03:03:24
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (27126)
Related
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Forest fire at New Jersey military base 80% contained after overnight rain
- The Daily Money: Why women struggle with retirement saving
- These top stocks could Join Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia in the $3 Trillion Club
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Trump sneakers, with photo from assassination attempt, on sale for $299 on Trump site
- Shooting attack at Oman mosque leaves 6 people dead, dozens wounded
- HGTV's Christina Hall, Josh Hall file for divorce after almost 3 years of marriage
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- The Surprising Comments Christina Hall Made About Her Marriage to Josh Hall Just Days Before Breakup
Ranking
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Isabella Strahan Shares Update on Health Journey After Ending Chemotherapy
- After heavy June rains, a buildup of manganese is discoloring a Louisiana city’s water supply
- Six nights in 1984 at Pauley Pavilion where US gymnasts won crowds of fans and Olympic glory
- Jamie Foxx reps say actor was hit in face by a glass at birthday dinner, needed stitches
- Her hearing implant was preapproved. Nonetheless, she got $139,000 bills for months.
- North Carolina Senate leader Berger names Ulm next chief of staff
- North Carolina Senate leader Berger names Ulm next chief of staff
Recommendation
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
Top Prime Day 2024 Deals on Accessories: $8 Jewelry, $12 Sunglasses, $18 Backpacks & More Stylish Finds
Christina Hall Shares Glimpse Into Family Time Amid Josh Hall Divorce
Griselda's Sofía Vergara Makes History With 2024 Emmy Nomination
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
FX's 'Shogun,' 'The Bear' top 76th Emmy Award nominations: Who else is up?
These top stocks could Join Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia in the $3 Trillion Club
After heavy June rains, a buildup of manganese is discoloring a Louisiana city’s water supply