Current:Home > ScamsSister of slain security officer sues Facebook over killing tied to Boogaloo movement -Finovate
Sister of slain security officer sues Facebook over killing tied to Boogaloo movement
View
Date:2025-04-17 20:08:21
The sister of a federal security officer who was fatally shot while guarding a courthouse during George Floyd-related protests has sued Facebook, accusing the tech giant of playing a role in radicalizing the alleged shooter.
Dave Patrick Underwood, 53, was shot and killed on May 29, 2020 in Oakland, Calif. Authorities have charged suspected gunman Steven Carrillo with murder. Investigators say Carrillo had ties to the far-right, anti-government boogaloo movement and that he organized with other boogaloo supporters on Facebook.
In a suit filed on Thursday in California state court against Meta, Facebook's parent company, Angela Underwood Jacobs accused Facebook officials of being aware that the social network was being used as a recruitment tool for boogaloo adherents, yet did not take steps to stop recommending boogaloo-related pages until after Underwood's death.
The boogaloo movement is a collection of far-right extremists who claim to want to overthrow the U.S. government through a second civil war. Sometimes clad in Hawaiian T-shirts, the group is known to be heavily arm and is highly active online.
Lawyers for Underwood Jacobs claim Facebook was negligent in designing a product "to promote and engage its users in extremist content" despite knowing that it could lead to potential violence.
"Facebook Inc. knew or could have reasonably foreseen that one or more individuals would be likely to become radicalized upon joining boogaloo-related groups on Facebook," the suit states.
Federal investigators have said Carrillo, an Air Force sergeant at the time of the shooting, used Facebook to communicate with other boogaloo supporters. On the same day as Underwood was killed, Carrillo allegedly posted to a Facebook group that he planned to go to the George Floyd protests in Oakland to "show them the real targets. Use their anger to fuel our fire," he allegedly wrote. "We have mobs of angry people to use to our advantage," according to federal prosecutors.
Authorities say Carrillo wrote that the protest was "a group opportunity to target the specialty soup bois," a phrase boogaloo adherents use to refer to law enforcement officials because of the "alphabet soup" of federal law enforcement acronyms.
Underwood Jacobs' suit contends that if Facebook altered its algorithm so that it was not recommending and promoting boogaloo groups, Carrillo may never had connected online with others in the extremist movement.
"Facebook bears responsibility for the murder of my brother," Underwood Jacobs said.
Facebook spokesman Andy Stone said the company will fight the suit.
"These claims are without legal basis, Stone said.
The lawsuit is the latest attempt to hold a Big Tech company accountable for real-world harm.
Social media companies largely escape legal responsibility in such cases thanks to a law known as Section 230, which prevents online platforms from being held liable for what users post.
There have been rare exceptions in attempting to advance lawsuits against tech companies, like when an appeals court found that Snapchat could be sued for a feature that allegedly encouraged reckless driving.
Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University Law School who studies Section 230, said Facebook will likely invoke the legal shield in this case, but he said the suit faces other hurdles, as well.
"There have been a number of lawsuits trying to establish that Facebook is liable for how violent groups and terrorists used their services," Goldman said. "And courts have consistently rejected those claims because services like Facebook aren't responsible for harms caused by people using the service."
The lawsuit leans heavily on the Facebook Files, a cache of internal company documents exposed in a series of stories by the Wall Street Journal. Among the allegations is that Facebook's algorithm promotes extremism, inflammatory and divisive content in order to keep users engaged and advertising dollars rolling in. Facebook researchers have estimated that the social network only catches between 3% and 5% of hate speech on the platform.
In a statement, lawyers for Underwood Jacobs said the Facebook Files revealed "Facebook's active role in shaping the content on its website as well as creating and building groups on the platform – activities that fall outside of the conduct protected by Section 230."
Facebook has reportedly banned nearly 1,000 private groups focused on "militarized social movements" like boogaloo.
Facebook has previously acknowledged its role in militia-fueled violence. In August 2020, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said it made an "operational mistake" in failing to remove a page for a militia group that called for armed citizens to enter Kenosha, Wisconsin. Two protesters were shot and killed there during demonstrations over the police shooting of Jacob Blake.
The same month, Facebook said it took down 2,400 pages and more than 14,000 groups on the site started by militia groups.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Judge threatens to dismiss lawsuit from Arkansas attorney general in prisons dispute
- 5 more boats packed with refugees approach Indonesia’s shores, air force says
- Taylor Swift baked Travis Kelce 'awesome' pregame cinnamon rolls, former NFL QB says
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- Nantz, Childress, Ralph and Steve Smith named to 2024 North Carolina Sports Hall of Fame class
- How Carey Mulligan became Felicia Montealegre in ‘Maestro’
- Honda recalls 106,000 CR-V hybrid SUVs because of potential fire risk. Here's what to know.
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Oil companies offer $382M for drilling rights in Gulf of Mexico in last offshore sale before 2025
Ranking
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- 'You see where that got them': Ja Morant turned boos into silence in return to Grizzlies
- When will Neymar play again? Brazil star at the 2024 Copa América in doubt
- States are trashing troves of masks and protective gear as costly stockpiles expire
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- The Denver Zoo didn't know who the father of a baby orangutan was. They called in Maury Povich to deliver the paternity test results
- Watch Los Angeles Chargers kicker Cameron Dicker's viral Pro Bowl campaign video
- A passenger hid bullets in a baby diaper at New York’s LaGuardia Airport. TSA officers caught him
Recommendation
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
New lawsuit against the US by protesters alleges negligence, battery in 2020 clashes in Oregon
How a utility company fought to keep two Colorado towns hooked on fossil fuels
See Meghan Markle Return to Acting for Coffee Campaign
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
After 2 grisly killings, a small Nebraska community wonders if any place is really safe
New Beauty I'm Obsessed With This Month: Rare Beauty by Selena Gomez, Murad, Maybelline, and More
2023 was a tragic and bizarre year of wildfires. Will it mark a turning point?